A Case for Discontinuing the Mileage Rule

Sunday, October 17, 2021
Posted by Armand Leone, Jr.


Leone Equestrian Law logo.jpg

In recent months, the United States Equestrian Federation (USEF) General Rule 314, otherwise known as the Mileage Rule, has again been a hot topic of discussion among U.S. equestrian competitors. Though I am not an authority on horse show and competition management, I have seen horse shows evolve since the rule’s inception in 1975. Especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, I now firmly believe that the Mileage Rule is no longer necessary or beneficial in today’s competition environment. Let me start by sharing my understanding of its intended purpose and how that landscape has shifted over the last several decades.

When the Mileage Rule was created by the American Horse Shows Association (AHSA), the precursor to US Equestrian (USEF), horse shows across the country looked much different than they do today. The concept of a multi-month, single-location horse show complex was unheard of. It’s hard to think of a competition that extended beyond two weeks. At the same time, there were less competitors and more local and regional competitions. The goal of the Mileage Rule was to support horse shows by eliminating competition between different nearby shows and ensuring, if an organizer spent time and money to put on a competition, that there would be a critical mass of horses and entries attending. Because of Horse of the Year Awards, competitors would seek out an AHSA-recognized show to gain points. Thus, the AHSA served a critical role in putting competitors and competitions together, providing membership to competitors, licensing for horse shows, and providing a rulebook to govern competition.

Free Market Principles

However, today’s landscape looks different than what we experienced in 1975. There has been a growth and consolidation of competition organizations that run USEF-sanctioned horse shows. Often, competitions occur in one location for several months at a time. This effectively prohibits the running of other competitions in the same region that can offer a different experience. Nowadays, there seems to be no shortage of competitors and many shows run out of stalls. The Mileage Rule prevents horses and riders from choice, which stifles competition, reduces variety, and limits access to shows that can offer a different price point and experience. Variety in competition venues—including different footing, rings, weather, and atmosphere—creates better riders and better horses. Competing in the same complex week after week does not present any new or different situations that help a horse and rider grow. It’s the same arenas, with the same fences, over and over again. Without the Mileage Rule, alternative competitions can be offered. The industry is robust enough that free-market principles should be allowed to operate, and competition organizations should succeed or fail on their merits. Having financial and competition venue alternatives keeps the sport vibrant and accessible to USEF members who have different financial situations, different horses, and different aspirations at different times during their equestrian careers.

It is logistically easier for trainers with many horses and riders to go to one venue for an extended period rather than to travel to several different shows, so there may be a place for large show venues to cater to the large trainer barns, but not at the expense of the general USEF member. Both riders and horses—whether they come from a larger or smaller barn—would benefit from the opportunity compete at different venues in the same geographical areas at levels and costs that make sense for each.

Discontinuing the Mileage Rule does not mean discontinuing licensing of competitions. USEF-sanctioned competitions are important in today’s horse show environment because quality, safety, officiating, and other rules about rules are important to fair and safe sport. However, the Mileage Rule does not contribute to those goals. The USEF is responsible for the sanctioning and regulation of equestrian events in the U.S. As the national governing body for equestrian sport, safety and standards are key. USEF-sanctioned events uphold safety and fairness standards related to drugs and medications, venue safety, and levels of competition that offer competitors a ladder from which to progress, for example. 
For decades, our sport has turned out successful, well-rounded rider and horse athletes, largely because of the opportunity to experience different atmospheres and challenges. If we want to preserve our sport’s heritage and create an environment that encourages rider and horse growth, I believe it’s time we discontinue the Mileage Rule for USEF-sanctioned competitions. Our sport is mature enough and large enough to do so.

Read More Articles at Leone Equestrian Law